<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 17 May 2012 23:49:14 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Home</title><subtitle>Home</subtitle><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/atom.xml"/><updated>2012-01-20T19:06:44Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>SCPS Alumni Survey Employment Profile</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/9/29/scps-alumni-survey-employment-profile.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/9/29/scps-alumni-survey-employment-profile.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-09-29T15:07:14Z</published><updated>2010-09-29T15:07:14Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>We closed the alumni survey at the end of August and are now tabulating results from that study. Here is a snapshot of those results.</p>
<p><strong>Employment&nbsp;Before Enrollment</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>75% were employed full time</li>
<li>6% were employed part time</li>
<li>3% were self-employed</li>
<li>5% were unemployed but looking</li>
<li>8% were full time students</li>
<li>3% Retired, in the military, or full time homemaker</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Employment While Enrolled In their Program of Study</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>58% were employed full time</li>
<li>17% were employed part time</li>
<li>2% were self employed</li>
<li>3% were unemployed but looking</li>
<li>17% became full time students</li>
<li>3% Retired, in the military, or full time homemaker</li>
</ul>
<p>The drop in full time employed students and the percent of those who had been looking for work can be explained by the rise in full time students and a significant increase in those working part time.</p>
<p><strong>Employment at Graduation</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>67% were employed full time</li>
<li>5% were employed part time</li>
<li>6% were self-employed</li>
<li>18% were unemployed but looking</li>
<li>4% Retired, in the military, or full time homemaker</li>
</ul>
<p>An additional 9% of&nbsp;students found employment upon graduation while 18% &mdash; many of whom were full time students &mdash;&nbsp;began searching for employment in earnest.&nbsp;There are also twice as many&nbsp;graduates who pursued self employment careers.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Current Employment Status</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>74% are employed full time</li>
</ul>]]></content></entry><entry><title>We're Now on LinkedIn</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/9/2/were-now-on-linkedin.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/9/2/were-now-on-linkedin.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-09-02T14:10:43Z</published><updated>2010-09-02T14:10:43Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>This week, I created a LinkedIn Group inviting all&nbsp;respondents&nbsp;of our recent alumni survey who have indicated an interest in participating as a panelist. I hope to initiate and develop a rich dialogue among our alumni on a variety of topics that touch on their professional and personal aspirations. If you are an alumni reading this (one can only hope), please feel free to participate even if you missed out on this year's survey. We would love to hear from you. To join, log in to your LinkedIn account and join the group: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&amp;gid=3355037&amp;trk=anet_ug_hm">NYU SCPS Graduate Program Research Panel Group</a>.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>DMA 2010 Response Rate Trend Report</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/6/15/dma-2010-response-rate-trend-report.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/6/15/dma-2010-response-rate-trend-report.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-06-15T22:43:52Z</published><updated>2010-06-15T22:43:52Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The Direct Marketing Association just published their findings from the&nbsp;2010 Response Rate Trend Report which provides key cost and performance benchmarks to help marketers gauge the efficiency of their campaigns.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Key Findings</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Email to a house list averaged:&nbsp; a 19.47 percent open rate; a 6.64 percent click-through rate; a 1.73 percent conversion rate; with a bounce-back rate of 3.72 percent and an unsubscribe rate of 0.77 percent.&nbsp;</li>
<li>Response rates for Direct Mail have held steady over the past four years.&nbsp; Letter-sized envelopes, for instance, had a response rate this year of 3.42 percent for a house list and 1.38 percent for a prospect list.&nbsp;</li>
<li>Catalogs had the lowest cost per lead/order of $47.61, just ahead of inserts at $47.69, email at $53.85, and postcards $75.32.&nbsp;</li>
<li>Outbound telemarketing to prospects had the highest cost per order or lead of $309.25, but it also had the highest response rate from prospects of 6.16 percent.&nbsp; The highest response rate for a house list was also telephone, at 10.41 percent.</li>
<li>Paid search had an average cost per click of $3.79, with a 3.81 percent conversion rate. The conversion rate (after click) of internet display advertisements was slightly higher at 4.43 percent.</li>
<li>Response rates for B-to-B campaigns were generally higher than for B-to-C campaigns.&nbsp; Lead generation and high-end average sale campaigns also had higher response rates.</li>
<li>Nearly 60 percent of direct mail campaigns in financial services aimed to produce a direct sale.&nbsp; The average response rate was a comparatively low 2.66 percent to a house list and 1.01percent to a prospect list. </li>
</ul>
<p>DMA&rsquo;s Response Rate Report Trend Report was conducted through a survey that was emailed in March and April 2010.&nbsp; When the survey was closed, DMA had received 473 usable responses.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.the-dma.org/cgi/dispannouncements?article=1451">Read more</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.the-dma.org/cgi/dispannouncements?article=1451">http://www.the-dma.org/cgi/dispannouncements?article=1451</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>2010 Study Finds McGhee Tuition Competitive With Peer Institutions</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/4/16/2010-study-finds-mcghee-tuition-competitive-with-peer-instit.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/4/16/2010-study-finds-mcghee-tuition-competitive-with-peer-instit.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-04-16T16:30:45Z</published><updated>2010-04-16T16:30:45Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The&nbsp;spring 2010&nbsp;competitive tuition study for adult undergraduate degree programs is underway and a cursory look at the numbers reveal&nbsp;that we are competitively priced&nbsp;among five other private nonprofit peer institutions (in NY, CT, and NJ) that charge more than $1,000 per credit.</p>
<ul>
<li>Fordham: $1,140 per credit</li>
<li>Drew University: $1,165 per credit</li>
<li>Sarah Lawrence College: $1,368 per credit</li>
<li>Albertus Magnus: $1,137 (Spring 2010 per credit excluding fees)</li>
<li>Columbia (CCS): $1,270 per credit</li>
<li>NYU McGhee: $1,078 (Spring 2010 per credit excluding fees)</li>
</ul>
<p>All&nbsp;five institutions offer adult undergraduate programs that closely match the degree programs offered by McGhee.</p>
<p>Among public four-year institutions, the lowest tuition is from Thomas Edison State College, a distance education only&nbsp;public nonprofit&nbsp;higher ed institution in New Jersey, charging $125 per credit for residents and $165 per credit for non-residents. This likely accounts for the school not having a physical campus. The highest tuition is also from a New Jersey public for profit institution, the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Tuition is currently&nbsp;at $378 per credit for residents and $788 for nonresidents.</p>
<p>(Note: Tuition&nbsp;stated is based on&nbsp;Web site information posted by the institution.)</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Leading Research Universities Commit to Improved Data on Undergraduate Education</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/4/8/leading-research-universities-commit-to-improved-data-on-und.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/4/8/leading-research-universities-commit-to-improved-data-on-und.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-04-08T14:46:53Z</published><updated>2010-04-08T14:46:53Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Although the announcement was made three years ago, NYU this year will be providing data to the AAU&rsquo;s Data Exchange (AAUDE). Collective statistics will&nbsp;report on undergraduate performance such as graduation rates, time to degree, and careers following graduation.</p>
<p>What makes this particular initiative different from past reports is that the study will&nbsp;track&nbsp;the student&rsquo;s undergraduate&nbsp;progress through graduation. This will allow for a better understanding of&nbsp;retention and stopout rates by including the student's progress at&nbsp;transferred institutions.</p>
<p>In the past, we have made assumptions that when a large percentage of students don&rsquo;t graduate&nbsp;from the same institution where&nbsp;they first enrolled, the institution&nbsp;has failed in its mission. For adult undergraduates, this isn&rsquo;t necessarily the case. For these students, things such as job relocation or financial burdens impact their ability to stay at one institution until graduation.&nbsp;A study of 12 institutions revealed that retention of adult undergraduates hovered around 50-70 percent. Not great when compared with traditional aged student retention of 80-90+ percent.</p>
<p>This new&nbsp;"retention" benchmark&nbsp;will&nbsp;focus less on&nbsp;stopout rates and more&nbsp;on the students ultimately graduating&nbsp;along with&nbsp;the careers they pursue afterward -- regardless of the number of institutions involved.</p>
<p><a href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/storage/AAU Universities Commit to Improved Data on Undergraduate Education1.pdf">Read More</a>&nbsp;or Visit AAU's Website at <a href="http://www.aau.edu">www.aau.edu</a></p>
<p><a href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/storage/CRR_347_Benchmarking_Adult_Undergraduate_Student_Retention_12.11.08.pdf">Adult Undergraduate Benchmarking Study (2008)</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Hiring Trends for Q2 of 2010</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/4/2/hiring-trends-for-q2-of-2010.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/4/2/hiring-trends-for-q2-of-2010.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-04-02T19:00:45Z</published><updated>2010-04-02T19:00:45Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Fox News predicts six employment trends for Q2 2010. Among them include hiring contract workers, increased number of internships, hiring for social media, and higher demand for bilingual individuals. Companies will also be reevaluating low performing employees but will do more to retain valued talent. Read more: <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/media/job-market-showing-gradual-improvement-according-quarterly-job-forecast/">&nbsp;Fox News</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Social Media – The New Frontier of Customer Feedback</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/3/23/social-media-the-new-frontier-of-customer-feedback.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/3/23/social-media-the-new-frontier-of-customer-feedback.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-03-23T20:35:18Z</published><updated>2010-03-23T20:35:18Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>A&nbsp;recent AMA (American Marketing Association) webcast revealed that only 4% of&nbsp;social media&nbsp;users will tell a company of their dissatisfaction in a survey. However, 52% will blog about a brand&rsquo;s products or service. And, 73% will post a product or brand review to sites like Amazon, Facebook, or Twitter.</p>
<p>Additionally, 40% have &ldquo;friended&rdquo; a brand on FB and/or MySpace, 65% had a digital experience change their opinion about a brand, and 97% who interacted with a brand online are likely to recommend to a friend.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 80%;"><em>Data Source: Razorfish via AMA</em></span></p>
<p>Among the social media best practices mentioned in the Webcast include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Being effective is better than being popular -- number of followers or fans are not an indication of an effective marketing strategy</li>
<li>Practice active listening -- this requires monitoring sites <span style="text-decoration: underline;">regularly</span>. Acknowledge and thank compliments, address complaints timely, act to resolve issues right away</li>
<li>Cross-sell, Up-sell</li>
<li>Analyze by looking below the surface and finding actionable insights, not shallow sentiments -- OSD research will be testing filter tools&nbsp;to distinguish between valuable feedback and media noise because only about 20% of feedback will be actionable.</li>
<li>Adapt and be ready to modify your approach and response at any time. Technology changes quickly. Yesterday it was all about keywords and search engine marketing. Today it is about social media. Tomorrow will surely be something else.</li>
</ul>
<p>To listen to the webcast: <a title="https://cc.readytalk.com/cc/playback/Playback.do?id=254zwe" href="https://cc.readytalk.com/cc/playback/Playback.do?id=254zwe">https://cc.readytalk.com/cc/playback/Playback.do?id=254zwe</a></p>
<p><strong>DOWNLOAD</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/storage/AMA_Allegiance_Presentation_Final.pdf">PDF</a> | 3 MB</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Mobile Marketing to Leap 26% this Year</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/2/22/mobile-marketing-to-leap-26-this-year.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/2/22/mobile-marketing-to-leap-26-this-year.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-02-22T19:59:20Z</published><updated>2010-02-22T19:59:20Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>While the medium will still snare just 1.8% of total marketing budgets, total spend will grow from $1.7 billion this year to $2.16 billion in 2010, according to new research from the MMA, <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107270">writes</a> MediaPost. <a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/mobile-marketing-to-leap-26-this-year-044289/">Read more</a>.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Thumbs Down To Recession-Centric Ads</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/2/1/thumbs-down-to-recession-centric-ads.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/2/1/thumbs-down-to-recession-centric-ads.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-02-01T16:22:30Z</published><updated>2010-02-01T16:22:30Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>More than six in 10 Americans (61%) have an opinion about advertising that mentions the recession, according to Harris Interactive. Of those who have an opinion, 44% believe the ads made brands more manipulative, 38% make the brands seem more realistic, and 20% depress the viewer and make them less likely to purchase the brand.</p>
<p>Women are more likely than men to have an opinion about recession-related advertising (64% vs. 59%). Of those with an opinion, women (42%) are more likely than men (31%) to say such ads make brands seem realistic. Men are more likely than women to say the ads make brands seem manipulative (49% vs. 39%) and they depress them and make them less likely to buy (20% vs. 17%).</p>
<p>&nbsp;Young adults, aged 18-34 (65%), are more likely than those aged 35-44 (58%), 45-54 (62%), and 55+ (60%) to have an opinion about ads that reference the recession. Young adults are divided on whether such ads are manipulative (42%) or realistic (42%). Those aged 55 and older (22%) are more likely than their younger counterparts to say that the ads depress them and make them less likely to buy. <a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/pubs/Harris_Poll_2009_10_14.pdf">Read more</a></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 350px;" src="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/storage/Recession%20Centric%20Advertising.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1265052475169" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><em>Source</em>: <a href="http://www.epmcom.com/products/consumer/ra/">Research Alert</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Most Americans Dislike Mobile Marketing</title><id>http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/2/1/most-americans-dislike-mobile-marketing.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/home/2010/2/1/most-americans-dislike-mobile-marketing.html"/><author><name>Office of Strategic Dev</name></author><published>2010-02-01T15:24:37Z</published><updated>2010-02-01T15:24:37Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The proportion of Americans who dislike mobile marketing increased in 2009 compared to 2008, according to BIGresearch. A third (67%) do not like text ads, 60% do not like voicemail ads, and 60% do not like video ads. As a result, an increased proportion (58%) believe marketers need to have their permission prior to sending them ads.</p>
<p>However, those who use mobile marketing are a desirable audience. They are tech savvy and more likely than non-users to plan to buy electronics within six months.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 350px;" src="http://scpsresearch.squarespace.com/storage/Mobile%20Marketing%20Graph.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1265052614207" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><em>Source</em>: <a href="http://www.bigsearch.com/">Simultaneous Media Survey 14</a></p>]]></content></entry></feed>
